Week 8: ‘Holy War and Just War in Christianity’.
How do I use this?
Just War
Jus in Bello = justification of going to war. Six conditions:
just cause
legitimate authority
right intentionally
proportionality
prospects of success
last resort
Jus ad Bellum = justice in fighting war. Two conditions:
proportionality
non-combatant immunity
Jus post-Bellum = delivering justice after the war
Need to understand:
– the Just War Tradition;
– just war theory;
– Pacifism and Realism;
these are two other Grand Theories regarding war
Realism – morality and justice do no apply to war;
Pacifism – all war is unjust.
the relationships between them.
Figures in the Just War Tradition:
St Augustine (354-430). Wrote at the time the Roman Empire became Christian.
Said the imperial power is lawful because it has the blessing of God (although there is nothing in the Gospels about running large empires.)
Argued for ‘wars of conversion’. It says those who do not worship God, what they do is unjust, therefore, it is our duty to wage war on them and convert them. Therefore, justice – for the non-believer – requires war.
Bernard of Clairvaux (1090-1153).
Wrote when Jerusalem had fallen to the Moslems and there was a risk of Christians being converted to Islam. Therefore, Jerusalem must be in Christian hands. The Moslem possession of Jerusalem is a threat to Christianity, therefore war is required.
Sounds mercenary rather than Christian as he says “a new form of military service”.
The Crusades were ‘wars of defence’.
St Thomas Aquinas (1224/25-1274)
Reverted to St Augustine’s view that it is Christian justice that warrants war, not Christianity directly.
Acting for the sinner, it is for their good. Also, if it is for the common good, it is OK. The violence is to rid the victim on an internal enemy.
These are wars of offence versus Christians.
Francisco de Vitoria (1486-1546)
Argued it was just to war against non-Christians who were committing acts such as cannibalism and human sacrifice, to protect the rights of the victims.
Hugo Grotius (1583-1645)
Modern just war. Removed the link with Christianity. Moved the argument from metaphysical to legal.
“The Law of War and Peace” 1625. Keeps to the ‘Thou shall not kill’ doctrine. Disputes Augustine and Aquinas. Says there can be no Christian justification. He says the components of justice – defence, reclaiming what is owing, punishment – cannot be found in Christianity.
These are secular wars.
Over time the Christian just war principle became a secular one. ? this was lecturer’s comment; needs a reference.
“Transforming violent conflict”
This looks as though they have used useful sources: https://rethinkingsecurity.org.uk/more/conciliation-resources/
“A study spanning 323 campaigns for major social change between 1900 and 2006 found that about half of the nonviolent campaigns succeeded in exacting major concessions from government, compared to only about a quarter of the campaigns that used violence (Stephan & Chenoweth, 2008).”
Stephan, M. J. & Chenoweth, E., 2008. ‘Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict’. International Security, 33(1), pp. 7-44.
Political Settlements Research Programme PA-X Peace Agreements Database is available at http://www.peaceagreements.org
The PA-X Peace Agreement Database is a database and repository of peace agreements from 1990 to date, current up until 1 January 2016.
Conciliation Resources produces the Accord publication series which informs and strengthens peace processes by documenting and analysing practical lessons and innovations of peacebuilding: https://www.c-r.org/accord
There is an annual Global Peace Index (GPI) report produced by the international think-tank the Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP). Going through all editions is one solution to finding alternatives to war.
“The 2018 GPI reveals a world in which the tensions, conflicts, and crises that emerged in the last decade remain unresolved, resulting in a gradual, sustained fall in peacefulness. The largest contributors to the deterioration in the last year were the escalations in both interstate and internal armed conflicts, rise in political terror and reduced commitment to UN peacekeeping. Syria, Afghanistan, South Sudan, Iraq and Somalia are the least peaceful countries whilst Iceland, New Zealand, Austria, Portugal and Denmark are the most peaceful countries.
“The GPI is the world’s leading measure of global peacefulness. The report covers 99.7 per cent of the world’s population and uses 23 qualitative and quantitative indicators from highly respected sources to compile the index. These indicators are grouped into three key domains: ‘ongoing conflict’, ‘safety and security’, and ‘militarisation’. All three domains deteriorated over the last year.”
Modelling of conflict
“A Generative Model of the Mutual Escalation of Anxiety Between Religious Groups” http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/21/4/7.html
(already saved in Useful Papers)
A list of conflict management techniques from to read about and blog about:
There is a list of conflict management techniques from the PPR.420 Course handbook. Where did this list come from?
Conflict Management Techniques:
Capacity-building: supporting local peace constituencies
Humanitarian relief
Legal protection of minorities
Quasi-mediation (Parties in the Conflict taking a mediation role)
Adoption of constructive means of prosecuting conflict by parties
Peace processes
Truth Recovery/Reconciliation
Education
Physical separation
Peace-keeping
Secret negotiations
Back-channels
Mediation
National Peace conferences
Peace Alliances
Peace and Conflict Impact Assessments
‘Deep’ or ‘Structural’ Conflict Prevention
‘Light’ or ‘Operational’ Conflict Prevention
Problem-solving workshops
External intervention/mediation
‘Mediation with muscle’
Community relations work
Inter-Ethnic Round Tables
Peace Zones
Confidence Building Measures
Supporting indigenous peace-builders
Capacity-Building
Conflict Resolution Training
Alphabetically sorted list:
Adoption of constructive means of prosecuting conflict by parties
Back-channels
Capacity-Building
Capacity-building: supporting local peace constituencies
Community relations work
Confidence Building Measures
Conflict Resolution Training
‘Deep’ or ‘Structural’ Conflict Prevention
Education
External intervention/mediation
Humanitarian relief
Inter-Ethnic Round Tables
Legal protection of minorities
‘Light’ or ‘Operational’ Conflict Prevention
Mediation
‘Mediation with muscle’
National Peace conferences
Peace Alliances
Peace and Conflict Impact Assessments
Peace processes
Peace Zones
Peace-keeping
Physical separation
Problem-solving workshops
Quasi-mediation (Parties in the Conflict taking a mediation role)
Secret negotiations
Supporting indigenous peace-builders
Truth Recovery/Reconciliation
Regarding the peace-sector organisations I have worked with or investigated, they are very good at saying war is bad, but poor at proposing alternatives. For example, Stop the War Coalition, Peace Pledge Union, …
Warrington Peace Centre (The Tim Parry Johnathan Ball Foundation for Peace) (2013 – 2015) – the Think programme: interventions in schools works to disrupt gangs.
Stop the War – protest marching does not work at all.
Conscience: Taxes for Peace not War – changing the system from within for a few. Peace Tax Bill: passed first reading. Not worked yet. Issues over ‘hypothecated tax’. The Treasury do not want this. Commissioning a report: Minister for Peace and how it did not go as intended.
Peace Tax Seven – Robin & others – civil disobedience by withholding tax can work, sort of.
Make Wars History – Chris Coverdale – withholding tax can also result in prison.
Peace Pledge Union – did not work for WW2. People did not keep to the pledge. So would they keep my suggested 11112018 pledge?
Scientists for Global Responsibility – is anybody listening? So much academic research funding comes from the arms industry. Why is SGR not more influential?
From Open University DD301’s discussion on using contravention of human rights to determine social harm, and PPR.225 Introduction to Peace Studies’ week 17 “Human Rights and Conflict Prevention” which suggested the question “The best way to prevent conflict is to entrench respect for, and adherence to, human rights”. To what extent can adherence to human rights be used as a measure of non-violence?
The UK is a member of the UN Security Council. What difference does that make either way?
With the UK being a member of the UN Security Council and human rights gaining greater recognition internationally, to what extent could a human rights based approach be taken to determine and select interventions internationally? (Although the Responsibility To Protect alows wars to be started to save people, just as Just Wars can kill people to save them.)
Write up the problems with having a private sector arms industry.
The private sector arms industry is part of the problem. The modern military-industrial-academic complex or Eisenhower’s 1960 military/industrial complex and US President whats-his-name circa 1919 making much the same warning and saying the arms industry must be re-nationalised to prevent future wars. Is this useful? Is it useful introduction or background material?
It is a problem because they are a powerful lobbying group. Also, they employ many people and so MPs say it cannot be reduced because that would lose jobs and so lose votes.
“UK military R&D is aggressive and counter-productive”
“Why is the UK government focusing R&D spending on offensive weapons in preference to tackling the roots of conflict?”
https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2013/sep/30/military-research-uk-government-weapons
Search for ‘ “evidence-based” peace ‘
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22evidence-based%22+peace&t=canonical&ia=web
Look into these methods for evaluating conflict:
This Wikipedia page has a list of models for conflict management:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_management#Orientations_to_conflict
The conflict continuum page has conflict models:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_continuum
Write up on blog about Just War theory.
Week 8: ‘Holy War and Just War in Christianity’.
How do I use this?
Just War
Jus in Bello = justification of going to war. Six conditions:
just cause
legitimate authority
right intentionally
proportionality
prospects of success
last resort
Jus ad Bellum = justice in fighting war. Two conditions:
proportionality
non-combatant immunity
Jus post-Bellum = delivering justice after the war
Need to understand:
– the Just War Tradition;
– just war theory;
– Pacifism and Realism;
these are two other Grand Theories regarding war
Realism – morality and justice do no apply to war;
Pacifism – all war is unjust.
the relationships between them.
Figures in the Just War Tradition:
St Augustine (354-430). Wrote at the time the Roman Empire became Christian.
Said the imperial power is lawful because it has the blessing of God (although there is nothing in the Gospels about running large empires.)
Argued for ‘wars of conversion’. It says those who do not worship God, what they do is unjust, therefore, it is our duty to wage war on them and convert them. Therefore, justice – for the non-believer – requires war.
Bernard of Clairvaux (1090-1153).
Wrote when Jerusalem had fallen to the Moslems and there was a risk of Christians being converted to Islam. Therefore, Jerusalem must be in Christian hands. The Moslem possession of Jerusalem is a threat to Christianity, therefore war is required.
Sounds mercenary rather than Christian as he says “a new form of military service”.
The Crusades were ‘wars of defence’.
St Thomas Aquinas (1224/25-1274)
Reverted to St Augustine’s view that it is Christian justice that warrants war, not Christianity directly.
Acting for the sinner, it is for their good. Also, if it is for the common good, it is OK. The violence is to rid the victim on an internal enemy.
These are wars of offence versus Christians.
Francisco de Vitoria (1486-1546)
Argued it was just to war against non-Christians who were committing acts such as cannibalism and human sacrifice, to protect the rights of the victims.
Hugo Grotius (1583-1645)
Modern just war. Removed the link with Christianity. Moved the argument from metaphysical to legal.
“The Law of War and Peace” 1625. Keeps to the ‘Thou shall not kill’ doctrine. Disputes Augustine and Aquinas. Says there can be no Christian justification. He says the components of justice – defence, reclaiming what is owing, punishment – cannot be found in Christianity.
These are secular wars.
Over time the Christian just war principle became a secular one. ? this was lecturer’s comment; needs a reference.
Study OpenLearn on War.
https://www.open.edu/openlearn/free-courses/full-catalogue
and search for ‘war’
“Transforming violent conflict”
This looks as though they have used useful sources:
https://rethinkingsecurity.org.uk/more/conciliation-resources/
“A study spanning 323 campaigns for major social change between 1900 and 2006 found that about half of the nonviolent campaigns succeeded in exacting major concessions from government, compared to only about a quarter of the campaigns that used violence (Stephan & Chenoweth, 2008).”
Stephan, M. J. & Chenoweth, E., 2008. ‘Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict’. International Security, 33(1), pp. 7-44.
Global Justice Now
Conflict, Stability and Security Fund
Must have arguments for peaceful interventions (as well as its faults)
https://www.globaljustice.org.uk//sites/default/files/files/resources/conflict_security_and_stability_fund_diverting_aid_and_undermining_human_rights_web.pdf
Safer World timeline of peaceful interventions:
http://galleries.saferworld.org.uk/gallery/25th-timeline/#/gallery/25th-timeline/slide/timeline/
Beyond that, the interventions they talk about are just their interventions.
Two World beyond War documents to go through:
https://www.worldbeyondwar.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/WPTL-CADMUS-version.pdf
saved as
LUDocs\Dissertation\Useful papers\World Peace Through Law Rethinking an Old Theory\WPTL-CADMUS-version.pdf
and
https://www.worldbeyondwar.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/peace-briefing-new-security-dilemma.pdf
saved as
LUDocs\Dissertation\Useful papers\The new security dilemma\peace-briefing-new-security-dilemma.pdf
A very comprehensive list of resources in a variety of media:
https://worldbeyondwar.org/resources/#warabolition
Lists of peace agreement databases (which may all be the same or derivative):
A search for “Peace Agreements Database” comes up with all sorts of things.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22peace+agreement+database%22&t=canonical&ia=web
PA-X Women And Peace Agreement Database – https://www.peacewomen.org/node/101315
The Transitional Justice Institute, at the University of Ulster, has launched a peace agreements database – https://humanrightsdoctorate.blogspot.com/2009/03/peace-agreements-database.html
Peace Agreement Portal – https://www.peaceagreements.org/portal
The Transitional Justice Peace Agreements Database – http://www.peaceagreements.ulster.ac.uk/
PA-X Peace Agreement Database Project – http://www.politicalsettlements.org/portfolio/pa-x-database/
PA-X Peace Agreements Database Peace Agreements Database – https://www.peaceagreements.org/
and others.
Political Settlements Research Programme PA-X Peace Agreements Database is available at http://www.peaceagreements.org
The PA-X Peace Agreement Database is a database and repository of peace agreements from 1990 to date, current up until 1 January 2016.
PA-X Publications Series
http://www.politicalsettlements.org/pax-series/
Conciliation Resources produces the Accord publication series which informs and strengthens peace processes by documenting and analysing practical lessons and innovations of peacebuilding:
https://www.c-r.org/accord
Political Settlements Research Programme
http://www.politicalsettlements.org/
http://www.politicalsettlements.org/about/how/themes/measurement/
http://www.politicalsettlements.org/about/how/themes/peace-processes/
http://www.politicalsettlements.org/publications-database/
“Introducing the Nonviolent Action in Violent Contexts (NVAVC) dataset ”
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022343318804855
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0022343318804855?journalCode=jpra
Positive News: ““Conflict is not inevitable” ”
https://www.positive.news/society/conflict-not-inevitable/
War Resisters’ International – Empowering Nonviolence
https://www.nonviolence.wri-irg.org/en?language=en
Go through the list of articles that have been published in the Journal of Peace Research
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_of_Peace_Research
https://journals.sagepub.com/home/jpr
There is an annual Global Peace Index (GPI) report produced by the international think-tank the Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP). Going through all editions is one solution to finding alternatives to war.
“The 2018 GPI reveals a world in which the tensions, conflicts, and crises that emerged in the last decade remain unresolved, resulting in a gradual, sustained fall in peacefulness. The largest contributors to the deterioration in the last year were the escalations in both interstate and internal armed conflicts, rise in political terror and reduced commitment to UN peacekeeping. Syria, Afghanistan, South Sudan, Iraq and Somalia are the least peaceful countries whilst Iceland, New Zealand, Austria, Portugal and Denmark are the most peaceful countries.
“The GPI is the world’s leading measure of global peacefulness. The report covers 99.7 per cent of the world’s population and uses 23 qualitative and quantitative indicators from highly respected sources to compile the index. These indicators are grouped into three key domains: ‘ongoing conflict’, ‘safety and security’, and ‘militarisation’. All three domains deteriorated over the last year.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Peace_Index
Modelling of conflict
“A Generative Model of the Mutual Escalation of Anxiety Between Religious Groups”
http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/21/4/7.html
(already saved in Useful Papers)
A list of conflict management techniques from to read about and blog about:
There is a list of conflict management techniques from the PPR.420 Course handbook. Where did this list come from?
Conflict Management Techniques:
Capacity-building: supporting local peace constituencies
Humanitarian relief
Legal protection of minorities
Quasi-mediation (Parties in the Conflict taking a mediation role)
Adoption of constructive means of prosecuting conflict by parties
Peace processes
Truth Recovery/Reconciliation
Education
Physical separation
Peace-keeping
Secret negotiations
Back-channels
Mediation
National Peace conferences
Peace Alliances
Peace and Conflict Impact Assessments
‘Deep’ or ‘Structural’ Conflict Prevention
‘Light’ or ‘Operational’ Conflict Prevention
Problem-solving workshops
External intervention/mediation
‘Mediation with muscle’
Community relations work
Inter-Ethnic Round Tables
Peace Zones
Confidence Building Measures
Supporting indigenous peace-builders
Capacity-Building
Conflict Resolution Training
Alphabetically sorted list:
Adoption of constructive means of prosecuting conflict by parties
Back-channels
Capacity-Building
Capacity-building: supporting local peace constituencies
Community relations work
Confidence Building Measures
Conflict Resolution Training
‘Deep’ or ‘Structural’ Conflict Prevention
Education
External intervention/mediation
Humanitarian relief
Inter-Ethnic Round Tables
Legal protection of minorities
‘Light’ or ‘Operational’ Conflict Prevention
Mediation
‘Mediation with muscle’
National Peace conferences
Peace Alliances
Peace and Conflict Impact Assessments
Peace processes
Peace Zones
Peace-keeping
Physical separation
Problem-solving workshops
Quasi-mediation (Parties in the Conflict taking a mediation role)
Secret negotiations
Supporting indigenous peace-builders
Truth Recovery/Reconciliation
Blog about military contractors:
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/britain-is-world-centre-for-private-military-contractors/
https://www.securitydegreehub.com/most-powerful-private-security-companies-in-the-world/
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/private-security-contractors
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/feb/03/britain-g4s-at-centre-of-global-mercenary-industry-says-charity
Write up what I have learned from volunteering.
Regarding the peace-sector organisations I have worked with or investigated, they are very good at saying war is bad, but poor at proposing alternatives. For example, Stop the War Coalition, Peace Pledge Union, …
Warrington Peace Centre (The Tim Parry Johnathan Ball Foundation for Peace) (2013 – 2015) – the Think programme: interventions in schools works to disrupt gangs.
Stop the War – protest marching does not work at all.
Conscience: Taxes for Peace not War – changing the system from within for a few. Peace Tax Bill: passed first reading. Not worked yet. Issues over ‘hypothecated tax’. The Treasury do not want this. Commissioning a report: Minister for Peace and how it did not go as intended.
Peace Tax Seven – Robin & others – civil disobedience by withholding tax can work, sort of.
Make Wars History – Chris Coverdale – withholding tax can also result in prison.
Peace Pledge Union – did not work for WW2. People did not keep to the pledge. So would they keep my suggested 11112018 pledge?
Scientists for Global Responsibility – is anybody listening? So much academic research funding comes from the arms industry. Why is SGR not more influential?
Look into these aspects of peace studies:
Research into Peace and Conflict Studies:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_and_conflict_studies#As_research_activity
Objections to peace methods:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_and_conflict_studies#Criticism_and_controversy
Miscellaneous conflict management research to read and blog.
This Wikipedia page has a list of models for conflict management:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_management#Orientations_to_conflict
The conflict continuum page has conflict models:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_continuum
Wikipedia’s pages in the category ‘peace and conflict studies’:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Peace_and_conflict_studies
Wikipedia’s ‘peace and conflict studies’:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_and_conflict_studies
Research into Peace and Conflict Studies:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_and_conflict_studies#As_research_activity
Consider: human rights and wars.
From Open University DD301’s discussion on using contravention of human rights to determine social harm, and PPR.225 Introduction to Peace Studies’ week 17 “Human Rights and Conflict Prevention” which suggested the question “The best way to prevent conflict is to entrench respect for, and adherence to, human rights”. To what extent can adherence to human rights be used as a measure of non-violence?
The UK is a member of the UN Security Council. What difference does that make either way?
With the UK being a member of the UN Security Council and human rights gaining greater recognition internationally, to what extent could a human rights based approach be taken to determine and select interventions internationally? (Although the Responsibility To Protect alows wars to be started to save people, just as Just Wars can kill people to save them.)
Write up the problems with having a private sector arms industry.
The private sector arms industry is part of the problem. The modern military-industrial-academic complex or Eisenhower’s 1960 military/industrial complex and US President whats-his-name circa 1919 making much the same warning and saying the arms industry must be re-nationalised to prevent future wars. Is this useful? Is it useful introduction or background material?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Is_a_Racket
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military%E2%80%93industrial_complex
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_war
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nye_Committee
https://www.npr.org/2011/01/17/132942244/ikes-warning-of-military-expansion-50-years-later
It is a problem because they are a powerful lobbying group. Also, they employ many people and so MPs say it cannot be reduced because that would lose jobs and so lose votes.
Rethinking Security has loads of links that need to be followed up:
– “Rethinking security: A discussion paper” at https://rethinkingsecurity.org.uk/portfolio/rethinking-security-paper/
– “Rethinking Security Parliamentary Briefing – Reframing UK national security in a global context” at https://rethinkingsecurityorguk.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/parliamentary-briefing-march-20181.pdf
– “TRACKING PEACE TRANSITIONS THROUGH A SYSTEMS THINKING APPROACH” at http://visionofhumanity.org/app/uploads/2017/10/Positive-Peace-Report-2017.pdf
– Further reading at https://rethinkingsecurity.org.uk/further-reading/
– Documents for policy makers at https://rethinkingsecurity.org.uk/policy-makers/
– documents for teachers at https://rethinkingsecurity.org.uk/education/
– Documents for supporters at https://rethinkingsecurity.org.uk/supporters/
Thank you for nice information